Royal family documentary leaked on YouTube


A fly-on-the wall documentary about the royal family has resurfaced in full on the internet before being swiftly removed.

Royal fans were able to view the entire 105-minute BBC programme on YouTube for the first time since it was withdrawn from use in the early 1970s.

The programme offered the first insight into the domestic life of the Windsors, showing the Queen and her family enjoying a picnic at Balmoral, where a kilted Duke of Edinburgh cooked sausages on a barbecue.

Other footage captured a bare chested Prince of Wales waterskiing and the Queen buying a young Prince Edward an ice cream with money from her own purse, before declaring: “This disgusting gooey mess is going to be in the car, isn’t it?”

The royal family during filming of the programme (PA)

In the Swinging Sixties, the royal family was viewed as becoming increasingly remote and alien compared with most people’s everyday lives.

The documentary, shot in colour, followed the Windsors for a year and was watched by millions of people.

It was a PR drive to highlight their “ordinary” side and was the first real look at the private life of the monarch and her children.

But a few years after it was broadcast, it was locked in the BBC archives – a move believed to have been made at the request of the Queen.

News Shopper: The Queen at Badminton Horse Trials during the 12 months of filming (PA)The Queen at Badminton Horse Trials during the 12 months of filming (PA)

Clips have been used over the years in other documentaries and as part of an exhibition for the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee but the entire programme has not been screened since the ban.

The full footage resurfaced on YouTube earlier this month and is believed to have been seen thousands of times before its deletion.

The BBC declined to comment but a source confirmed the broadcaster had submitted a copyright claim.

YouTube said the leaked film had been removed.

A spokeswoman for the video-sharing platform said: “This video has been removed due to a copyright claim.”

She added: “When a copyright claim is filed we remove the content immediately, as is the case with this upload.”

A Buckingham Palace spokesman declined to comment.

In one part of the film, a relaxed Queen chatted with her family around a table about how the Home Secretary told her she had a “gorilla” coming to visit.

News Shopper: Princess Anne and the Queen Mother in 1969 (PA)Princess Anne and the Queen Mother in 1969 (PA)

The Queen was seen telling her laughing family how she thought the remark “unkind” but found it hard to keep a straight face when encountering the man.

“There was a gorilla. I had the most terrible trouble … he had short body, long arms,” she said.

Years later, the Princess Royal admitted her dislike of the programme.

Anne said: “I never liked the idea of the royal family film. I always thought it was a rotten idea.

News Shopper: The documentary showed the royal family in a private setting (PA)The documentary showed the royal family in a private setting (PA)

“The attention that had been brought on one ever since one was a child, you just didn’t want anymore. The last thing you needed was greater access.”

Anti-monarchy group Republic this week called for the documentary to be released.

Graham Smith, Republic’s chief executive, claimed the 1969 film did not show the monarchy in a “good light” and said it was an “outrage” the programme was being “deliberately” withheld from the public.

He said Republic would be writing to the BBC’s director-general Tim Davie to set out the case for releasing the documentary.

Mr Smith, who claimed the monarchy wanted the film to remain in the BBC archive, said: “It is clear that the royals are worried about damage to their image, which is why they’re insisting the documentary stay locked away.

“It is not the job of the BBC to protect the royals from scrutiny. No-one else would have that kind of power over the BBC.”

“This is a BBC documentary, the decision to broadcast it or make it available online is the BBC’s. To deliberately keep it away from the public is an outrage.”





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *